EPIF Position Paper On The EBA Gl ON PI Insurance

EPIF does not agree on the requirement of undertakings and believe that the minimum monetary amount  should always cover the potential liabilities. EPIF does not agree on the indicators under the type of activity criteria should be calculated and believes that the size of activity indicator is exaggerated.

2018-01-12T11:09:06+00:00

EPIF Position Paper on the EBA Guidelines on PI Insurance for PSPS’

EPIF is pleased to share its position paper on the EBA Guidelines on PI Insurance  for PSPS’. There appears an over-reliance on insurance to underpin the new TPP market. This appears to be the assumed solution even in the title of the ‘Guidelines on Professional Indemnity (PI) insurance for PSPs’. This is unfortunate since there is no such [...]

2018-01-12T11:09:43+00:00

EPIF Response to EBA consultation on Regulatory Technical Standards on passporting under PSD2

The European Payment Institutions Federation is pleased to share its responses to the EBA consultation on Regulatory Technical Standards on passporting under the PSD2. EPIF suggests that Host State competent authorities should provide reference to applicable main regulations and reporting requirements for Payment Insitutions using their passporting rights in the Host Country. EPIF strongly suggest no [...]

2018-01-12T11:10:04+00:00

EPIF Position Paper on the PSD2

EPIF welcomes the publication of the proposal for a Payment Services Directive 2 (PSD 2). EPIF is hereby identifying some key issues that need to be addressed in order to improve the current proposal.  This  includes,  amongst  other  topics,  the passporting regime, the use of agents, the access to bank services for payment institutions, safeguarding [...]

2018-01-12T11:12:35+00:00
Go to Top